- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:54:53 -0800
- To: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is a pretty radical change; I can certainly see the logic of it in > terms of reducing spec overlap. However, it does presume that semantically a > widget preference is the same as client-side storage. In our implementation, > storage is definitely server-side, so this mechanism would not really work > for us. I'm not sure I understand the difference. Can you describe why your implementation wouldn't be able to store the HTML5 API server-side? Are there any changes we could do to the HTML5 API that would allow a server-side back-end? / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 02:55:30 UTC