Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures

we need explicit schema support (in Signature 1.1) for explicit OCSP  
responses, for the latter  a processing rule in widgets signature may  
be enough. Perhaps this does not need to be required must in the  
widgets spec, depends on requirements.

Mark, I believe you mentioned you have additional thoughts on these  

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 4 Feb 2009, at 21:45, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> * Is supporting OCSP and CRL a MUST for v1?
> Just for clarity, there are two possible requirements around OCSP and
> CRLs:
>  - support embedding an OCSP response (or a CRL, or a link to a CRL)
> in the mark-up of signatures
>  - support querying OCSP responders (and CRLs) as part of certificate
> validation
> I'd argue that the latter is more important than the former.
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <>

Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 20:54:21 UTC