- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:31:35 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Art, On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > > I propose the following changes to the 22 December 2008 P&C LCWD [1]: > > 1. As currently written, the spec implies a Widget User Agent must support > [Widgets-DigSig]. I think that requirement is too strong and must be > relaxed. To address this, change the first paragraph in Section 3.0 to: > > [[ > A widget user agent is a user agent that implements this specification. A > widget user agent should implement other specifications in the Widgets 1.0 > family of specifications such as [Widgets-APIs], [Widgets-DigSig], and > [Widgets-Updates] specifications. > ]] Ok, fair enough. However, I think the words "such as" does not make the assertion sound particularly definitive. I think it MUST that widget engines support the APIs and a SHOULD that they support updates and sigs. New text: "A widget user agent is a user agent that attempts to implement this specification. A widget user agent MUST also support the [Widgets-APIs]. A widget user agent SHOULD support the [Widgets-DigSig] specification and the [Widgets-Updates] specification." As you did, I removed reference to the fictional [Widget Security] specification :) > 2. Change the first paragraph of Step 4 in section 8.2 to: > > [[ > If a widget user agent does not support [Widgets-DigSig], go to Step 6; > otherwise, the algorithm to locate digital signatures for the widget is as > follows: > ]] Done. > 3. Signature handling should be specified in [Widgets-DigSig], thus, replace > all of Step 5 in section 8.2 with the following: > > [[ > The algorithm that describes how to process the list of signatures created > in step 4 is defined in [Widgets-DigSig]. > ]] > > And add the processing model currently defined in Step 5 to > [Widgets-DigSig]. I need to discuss this change with the editor's of the Widget Dig Sig spec before doing that. I'll get back to you shortly about that. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Saturday, 31 January 2009 13:32:18 UTC