- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:40:25 -0500
- To: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
Giovanni Campagna wrote: > 2009/1/28 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>: >> Giovanni Campagna wrote: >>> well, assuming that an author will need to match elements across >>> multiple namespaces, it will be easier to use XPath (that also is >>> compatible across multiple browsers) than to use horrible workarounds >>> like "svg :not(foreignObject) *[href]" (all svg links) >> I should note that that selector doesn't actually work to select things that >> are not inside a foreignObject... Offhand, I see no way to do that, in >> fact. > Why shouldn't it? <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <g> <foreignObject> <foo xmlns="" href="This is my random href attribute"/> </foreignObject> </g> </svg> The <foo> element matches the "svg :not(foreignObject) *[href]" selector. Indeed, "*[href]" matches the <foo> element, ":not(foreignObject)" matches the <g>, and "svg" matches the <svg>. > It is the summary of the email Lachlan linked, with pros and cons of > various solutions. Oh, ok. So that was just reiterating what had already been said. Gotcha. > It is not only SVG, it is any markup language that may be mixed to > build a compound document. There is a lot less of a problem with languages that don't have colliding localNames. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 16:41:09 UTC