- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:02:04 -0800
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 13 Jan 2009, at 09:58, Doug Schepers wrote: >> Since it can be about more than just data, e.g. images, "Cross-Origin >> Resource Sharing" might be more appropriate. Keeping the header names >> the same seems fine, they're just opague strings, but at least >> making it >> more clear what the specification is about might help people. > Cross-Origin Resource Sharing seems like a pretty good name to me. > Cross-Origin Resource and Permissions Sharing Exchange is a funnier > acronym, but that might not be the best criteria for name > selection. I > think that images are just another kind of data, but "resource" is > probably more evocative of a range of data types. I'd be very happy to see this spec's name changed to something that doesn't confuse people.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 22:02:15 UTC