- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:58:31 -0500
- To: public-webapps@w3.org, mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
Hi, Cameron- My opinion is that the editor of the Element Traversal spec simply didn't know what he was doing (no offense). I would suggest that a separate file be made with the appropriate Java interface file, with the appropriate license, and that it be linked from an errata (and later a second edition). Would this work for you, and for the rest of the WebApps WG? Regards- -Doug Cameron McCormack wrote (on 1/11/09 11:04 PM): > Hello WG. > > A question[1] just came up within the ASF about the license under which > the ElementTraversal Java interface is made. > > Unlike some other W3C specifications, where Java interface files are > made available as separate files (perhaps within a ZIP file) with a > header at the top that states that the file is licensed under the W3C > Software License[2], the Element Traversal specification includes the > Java interface inline. The specification itself is licensed under the > W3C Document License[3], which likely isn’t suitable for inclusion in > ASF software distributions. > > Some time ago, I added the Java interface to the Batik project’s > repository[4]. The main contents of that file do not exactly match the > text that is in the specification; the formatting is different. I did > however add the Apache License header to the top of that file, as is > done with other non-external source code. Given that the contents of > the file don’t exactly match the text in the spec (but is quite > similar), and could reasonably have been generated from the IDL, I’m not > sure if including that header was the correct course of action. > > So my questions are: > > 1. Should I replace the ElementTraversal.java file in the Batik > repository with one that is identical to the text in the Element > Traversal spec, but with a W3C license header at the top, and if so, > which one? > > 2. Should the W3C be explicitly licensing the ElementTraversal.java file > under the W3C Software License? > > Thanks, > > Cameron > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/lgqmiixh4l3bdugv > [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 > [3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 > [4] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/batik/trunk/sources/org/w3c/dom/ElementTraversal.java >
Received on Monday, 12 January 2009 04:58:44 UTC