Tuesday, 31 March 2009
- Re: ISSUE-87 (wheel targets): Target node types for mousewheel/mousemultiwheel events [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-87 (wheel targets): Target node types for mousewheel/mousemultiwheel events [DOM3 Events]
- Re: [widgets] Digsig namespace document
- [widgets] Digsig namespace document
- Re: ISSUE-87 (wheel targets): Target node types for mousewheel/mousemultiwheel events [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-87 (wheel targets): Target node types for mousewheel/mousemultiwheel events [DOM3 Events]
- Seeking comments for ARIA Last Call WD; deadline is 17 April 2009
Monday, 30 March 2009
Sunday, 29 March 2009
- RE: [admin] Seeking clarification of otsi-arch-sec mail list
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: <access> and IRI equivalence
- Re: [widgets] restrictions on XML base
Saturday, 28 March 2009
Friday, 27 March 2009
- Re: [widget-digsig] Updated Editors Draft of Widget Signature
- [widget-digsig] Updated Editors Draft of Widget Signature
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- [admin] Seeking clarification of otsi-arch-sec mail list
- [admin] Seeking clarification of otsi-arch-sec mail list
- Re: [widgets] Author
- [widgets] Author
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft, further comments
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft, further comments
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft, further comments
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft, further comments
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] Author
Thursday, 26 March 2009
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] Author, was: RE: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] Author, was: RE: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] Author, was: RE: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- AW: RE: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- RE: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- AW: Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Simple approach for <access>
- [widgets] Minutes from 26 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- additional widgets signature fix
- Re: <access> and IRI equivalence
- Re: <access> and IRI equivalence
- Re: <access> and IRI equivalence
- <access> and IRI equivalence
- RE: [widgets] Agenda for 26 March 2009 Voice Conference ; 90 Minutes
- RE: [BONDI Architecture & Security] [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [widgets] restrictions on XML base
- XHR and the storage mutex
Wednesday, 25 March 2009
- Re: [widgets] new digsig draft
- Re: [widgets] new digsig draft
- [widgets] new digsig draft
- [widgets] Agenda for 26 March 2009 Voice Conference ; 90 Minutes
- ISSUE-86 (rewrite-suggestion): Consider splitting out events and rewriting definitions [DOM3 Events]
Tuesday, 24 March 2009
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Fwd: [D3E] Agenda, telecon 1830Z wed 25 March
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- Re: Web Sigining in Action
- RE: localStorage and IE8
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
Monday, 23 March 2009
- localStorage and IE8
- Allowing widget to change (or "ask to change") it's own mode
- Re: Selectors API
- RE: FW: problems using http://bondi.omtp.org/
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: FW: problems using http://bondi.omtp.org/
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
- Re: Selectors API
- Selectors API
- RE: [widgets] Comments on the 9-Feb-2009 BONDI v1.0 Release Candidate
- [widgets] Seeking status of the A&E spec
- [widgets] Comments on the 9-Feb-2009 BONDI v1.0 Release Candidate
Sunday, 22 March 2009
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Web Sigining in Action
Saturday, 21 March 2009
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
Friday, 20 March 2009
- Excel Avançado
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- [widgets] FYI - Opera's feedback to BONDI
- FW: [widgets] Minutes from 19 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] restrictions on XML base
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- [cors] WD published
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- [widgets] restrictions on XML base
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
Thursday, 19 March 2009
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [widget-digsig] Editorial update of Widget Signature
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widget-digsig] Editorial update of Widget Signature
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- [widget-digsig] Editorial update of Widget Signature
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widget-digsig] Editors note to be added to widget signature
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- RE: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widget-digsig] changed widget signature files processing rule in section 4
- Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- RE: [widget-digsig] proposed change to 7.1, common constraints, for algorithms
- [widgets] Minutes from 19 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widget-digsig] Editors note to be added to widget signature
- RE: [widget-digsig] proposed change to 7.1, common constraints, for algorithms
- [widget-digsig] Editors note to be added to widget signature
- RE: [widgets-digsig] Updated 5.1 with revised Reference constraint text
- RE: [widget-digsig] changed widget signature files processing rule in section 4
- RE: [widgets] Agenda for 19 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 25 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting
- [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- RE: [widgets] Minutes from 25 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: Splitting out sections from HTML5
Wednesday, 18 March 2009
- Re: [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 19 March 2009 Voice Conference
- [widget-digsig] changed widget signature files processing rule in section 4
- [widgets-digsig] Updated 5.1 with revised Reference constraint text
- Re: [widget-digsig] zip relative path update
- [widget-digsig] proposed change to 7.1, common constraints, for algorithms
- [XHR2] Upload progress events and simple cross-origin requests
- Splitting out sections from HTML5
- [widget-digsig] zip relative path update
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- [widgets] OMTP BONDI feedback deadline reminder - 23rd March
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s
- [widgets] Agenda for 19 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [cors] Redirects
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
Tuesday, 17 March 2009
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [cors] Redirects
- [cors] Redirects
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Preflight algorithm and content types
- Re: Widget Requirement 37 (URI scheme etc)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [XHR2] Upload events flag
Monday, 16 March 2009
- RE: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- RE: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- RE: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [cors] Redirects and preflights
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- RE: [widgets-digsig] Editors Draft update and open issues
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- [widgets-digsig] Editors Draft update and open issues
- RE: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- RE: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- RE: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [widgets] Declarative support for a widget's metadata
- Re: [XHR2] Upload events flag
- [CORS] Preflight algorithm and content types
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [CORS] Charset in content type
- [CORS] Charset in content type
- RE: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
Sunday, 15 March 2009
Friday, 13 March 2009
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Widget Signature Proposal: Add constraints on ds:Reference URIs
- Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- RE: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
Thursday, 12 March 2009
- RE: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF
- RE: widget signature proposed change: ABNF
- Re: widget signature proposed change: ABNF
- RE: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)
- Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- RE: widget signature proposed change: ABNF
- widget signature proposed change: ABNF
- RE: [widgets] Digsig optimization
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- [XHR2] Upload events flag
- [widgets] Minutes from 12 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- [selectors-api] Test Suite Missing tests for Namespace Selectors
- Re: Widget Signature update
- RE: Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)
Wednesday, 11 March 2009
- Fwd: Last Call for comments on Selectors (css3-selectors)
- [D3E] Draft minutes from 11 March 2009 telcon
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names
- Re: [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Re: Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)
- [Widgets] Widget Gallery RSS like sharing format
- Small question about latest version of "P&C specs" (11th Mar 2009)
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 12 March 2009 Voice Conference; *** NOTE TIME CHANGE FOR non-US ***
- Re: comments on Packaging and Configuration specification
Tuesday, 10 March 2009
- Re: comments on Packaging and Configuration specification
- Re: Progress Events normative text
- [widgets] Agenda for 12 March 2009 Voice Conference; *** NOTE TIME CHANGE FOR non-US ***
- [widgets] Opportunities and ToDos ... [Was: Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference]
- widget signature proposal - Identifier and Created Signature property
- Re: comments on Packaging and Configuration specification
- Re: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- Re: ISSUE-85 (clipops security practice): What are common sucrity practices for Clipboard APIs? [Clipboard Operations]
- Re: comments on Packaging and Configuration specification
- RE: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
Monday, 9 March 2009
- Re: ISSUE-85 (clipops security practice): What are common sucrity practices for Clipboard APIs? [Clipboard Operations]
- Re: Widget Signature update
- Re: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- RE: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- RE: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- RE: [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- [widgets] Making config.xml mandatory
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- comments on Packaging and Configuration specification
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [PrototypeRoot]
- ISSUE-85 (clipops security practice): What are common sucrity practices for Clipboard APIs? [Clipboard Operations]
- ISSUE-84 (Read-only cutting): Should cut work like copy on read-only content? [Clipboard Operations]
Sunday, 8 March 2009
Saturday, 7 March 2009
- Re: [PrototypeRoot]
- [PrototypeRoot]
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
Friday, 6 March 2009
- Re: Widget Signature update
- Widget Signature update
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- Re: [widgets] Strawman requirements for widget (view/display/window) modes
- Re: [cors] Call for Consensus to publish new Working Draft; ends March 6
Thursday, 5 March 2009
- Apple Patent Exclusion on Widgets 1.0: Updates
- Re: numbering
- RE: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-82 (Access element naming conflict): potential conflict between the XHTML <access> and Widget <access> element [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-19: Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use cases and requirements [Widgets]
- Re: numbering
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: numbering
- Updated Widgets 1.0 Signature editors draft
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: New Progress draft 1.30
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: numbering
- [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: New Progress draft 1.30
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- numbering
- [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change
- RE: Re: BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009
- Re: BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009
- New Progress draft 1.30
- Re: Progress Events normative text
- RE: [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
Thursday, 5 March 2009
- Re: [cors] Redirects and preflights
- Fwd: Draft minutes 2009-03-03 DOM 3 Events telecon
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: [cors] Redirects and preflights
- DOM 3 discussions moving to www-dom@w3.org
- [cors] Redirects and preflights
Wednesday, 4 March 2009
- [widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- [Widgets] Opera's position on Elliptic Curve and x509v3
- Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
- Re: information about the Palette Portal presentation
- [Selectors] Selectors to Proposed Rec - call for consensus
- [selectors api] editorial trivia
- [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests
Tuesday, 3 March 2009
Monday, 2 March 2009
Tuesday, 3 March 2009
- [widget] information about the Palette Portal presentation
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set
- Re: [cors] Status
Monday, 2 March 2009
- Additional Widgets 1.0 Digital Signatures updates
- Re: [cors] Call for Consensus to publish new Working Draft; ends March 6
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- [cors] Call for Consensus to publish new Working Draft; ends March 6
- Re: [cors] Status
Sunday, 1 March 2009
Saturday, 28 February 2009
Friday, 27 February 2009
- Re: [widgets] Digsig optimization
- Re: [widgets] Digsig optimization
- Re: [widgets] Digsig optimization
- [widgets] Digsig optimization
- Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Analysis (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
Thursday, 26 February 2009
- [widgets] slides from Scott's presentation
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Analysis (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- fyi: W3C XML Security Specifications announcement
- Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Analysis (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- RE: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Widget Requirement 37 (URI scheme etc)
- [widgets] Minutes from 24 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting
- [widgets] Minutes from 25 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting
- [widgets] Minutes from 26 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting
- WebApps WG & the "OMTP Turin Rules" are now Public
- Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Re: Minutes Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight
- ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Re: [xhr2] Redirect during send question
- Re: [xhr2] Redirect during send question
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
Thursday, 26 February 2009
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
- Re: ACTION-306: Trust anchors
- Re: ACTION-306: Trust anchors
- Re: ACTION-306: Trust anchors
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Minutes Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Agenda Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight
- Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
- Re: [cors] Status
- DOM3 Events call today/tonight?
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
Wednesday, 25 February 2009
- Re: [xhr2] Redirect during send question
- [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set
- Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping
- ACTION-306: Trust anchors
- Re: Review of latest Widget Signature Draft
- Re: Review of latest Widget Signature Draft
- Review of latest Widget Signature Draft
- Re: [cors] Updates
- Re: [access-control] Security Considerations
- Re: [cors] Status
- Re: [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases
- Re: [cors] cache-max-age: just 86400s?
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- Re: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Updated Widgets 1.0 Signature editors draft
- Re: [widgets] Strawman requirements for widget (view/display/window) modes
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
Monday, 23 February 2009
- Re: [widgets] Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh out the details of the processing model for multiple signatures
- Re: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- RE: [widgets] A revised proposal on widget modes
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
- RE: [widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)
- Re: [widgets] Declarative support for a widget's metadata
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
- RE: [widgets] Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh out the details of the processing model for multiple signatures
- Re: Widget Packaging and configuration LC review
- Re: [widgets] OAuth and openID
Sunday, 22 February 2009
- Re: [widgets] A revised proposal on widget modes
- Re: Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments...
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 19 February 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh out the details of the processing model for multiple signatures
- ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets]
- Re: [widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)
- Re: [widgets] Action 293: Add the tag: scheme to the scheme pros and cons document
- [widgets] OAuth and openID
- Re: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
Saturday, 21 February 2009
Friday, 20 February 2009
- Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: <access> Element
- ISSUE-82 (Access element naming conflict): potential conflict between the XHTML <access> and Widget <access> element [Widgets]
- Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: <access> Element
- Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: <access> Element
- Re: [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: <access> Element
- [widgets] [access] Naming Conflict: <access> Element
Thursday, 19 February 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- [widgets] The access element (was: RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec)
- [widgets] Action #224 - Work with Marcos to flesh out the details of the processing model for multiple signatures
- Re: [widgets] Declarative support for a widget's metadata
- [widgets] Declarative support for a widget's metadata
- Re: Using different widget signature roles
- [widgets] Minutes from 19 February 2009 Voice Conference
- [widgets] Digital Signature Roles - summary of proposal
- [widgets] A revised proposal on widget modes
- RE: If not Multiple-Contents, how do we have Widgets with multiple modes?
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- RE: [widgets] Agenda for 19 February 2009 Voice Conference
Wednesday, 18 February 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- [widgets] Media type declarations
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- Re: [widgets] Content-Type Processing Model
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined
- [widgets] Agenda for 19 February 2009 Voice Conference
Tuesday, 17 February 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- Re: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: [cors] Possible need for a "Destination" Header
- Re: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- RE: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- Re: [cors] Possible need for a "Destination" Header
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: [cors] Possible need for a "Destination" Header
Monday, 16 February 2009
Tuesday, 17 February 2009
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- [Widgets] Change of Affiliation
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- 25 Feb 1930Z Re: restarting DOM 3 Events calls
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
Monday, 16 February 2009
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
Sunday, 15 February 2009
- [widgets] Ben Laurie on OpenSSL algorithms (and Elliptic Curve)
- Fwd: Unicode normalization issue summary
Friday, 13 February 2009
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- MIME types for packaged content (was re: tag: uri scheme)
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- RE: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: Fwd: tag: uri scheme
- Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- Re: widgets 1.0 requirements suggestion
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: tag: uri scheme
- Re: If not Multiple-Contents, how do we have Widgets with multiple modes?
- Re: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- Re: [selectors-api] Stringifying undefined (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
Thursday, 12 February 2009
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: [cors] cache-max-age: just 86400s?
- ISSUE-81: ECDSAwithSHA256 as required algorithm in place of DSAwithSHA256? [Widgets]
- [widgets] Minutes from 12-Feb-2009 Voice Conference
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Selectors API Test Suite Update
- [cors] cache-max-age: just 86400s?
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: [whatwg] DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: [whatwg] DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-feature-element
- [widgets] Fwd: Widget test reorganisation
- Re: [widgets] Action 293: Add the tag: scheme to the scheme pros and cons document
- Re: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- widgets 1.0 requirements suggestion
- RE: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- RE: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- RE: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 12 February 2009 Voice Conference: NOTE NEW TIME!
- Re: [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
- Re: [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
- Re: [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: [whatwg] DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: [Web Workers API] Data synchronization
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
Wednesday, 11 February 2009
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- [XHR2] Progress events during synchronous requests
- [widgets] Action 293: Add the tag: scheme to the scheme pros and cons document
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: DOMTimeStamp binding
- DOMTimeStamp binding
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- [widgets] Agenda for 12 February 2009 Voice Conference: NOTE NEW TIME!
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- RE: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
Tuesday, 10 February 2009
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases
- Re: [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases
- [cors] ACTION-11 API use cases
- Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute
- Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute
- RE: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments
Monday, 9 February 2009
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- Re: [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute
- Seeking implementation status of XBL2
- [webidl] [Implements] extended attribute
- Re: [cors] Updates
- Re: [cors] Updates
- Re: [cors] Updates
- [cors] Updates
- [cors] Status
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- If not Multiple-Contents, how do we have Widgets with multiple modes?
- XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
Saturday, 7 February 2009
Friday, 6 February 2009
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- RE: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- RE: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-feature-element
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Explain intended use of Access-Control-Origin?
- RE: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
Thursday, 5 February 2009
- Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2
- Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2
- Fwd: Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web: Workshop Report Published
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
- Re: ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec
Wednesday, 4 February 2009
- W3C is Not Pay-to-Play (was: Required support for SVG in widgets)
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- Re: [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- [widgets] Getting synch'ed up on Widgets Digital Signatures
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: [origin] Thoughts and comments
- Explain intended use of Access-Control-Origin?
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
Tuesday, 3 February 2009
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: Required support for SVG in widgets
- Re: [widgets] Content-Type Processing Model
- Required support for SVG in widgets
- [widgets] Strawman requirements for widget (view/display/window) modes
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- RE: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: [widgets] Content-Type Processing Model
- [widgets] NO voice conference on 5 Feb; next call is 12 Feb
- Re: Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- Comment period extended to Feb 11 for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Widget API Set/GetPreferences vs. HTML5 Key/Value Pairs Storage
- Re: restarting DOM 3 Events calls
- Fwd: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
Monday, 2 February 2009
- ISSUE-80: Runtime localization model for widgets [Widgets]
- RE: restarting DOM 3 Events calls
- Use Cases for Use Cases (was: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API)
- restarting DOM 3 Events calls
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
Saturday, 31 January 2009
- [widgets] APIs and Events ready for pub
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
- [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: P&C spec
Friday, 30 January 2009
- RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- Re: [widgets] Content-Type Processing Model
- RE: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- [widgets] Content-Type Processing Model
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- RE: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
Thursday, 29 January 2009
- Widgets 1.0 Packaging and Configuration: I18N comments...
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- RE: Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon
- Re: [widgets] Widget modes
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- [widgets] Widget modes
- [widgets] Minutes from 29 January 2009 Voice Conference
- [widgets] Base folder and resolution of relative paths
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon (was: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009)
- DOM3EV: Target node types for mousewheel/mousemultiwheel events
- Re: SVG as Widget Icon (was: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009)
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
Wednesday, 28 January 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Typographical errors
- Typographical errors
- Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- SVG as Widget Icon (was: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009)
- Re: [widgets] Removing plugins attribute
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- [widgets] Agenda for 29 January 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Removing plugins attribute
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
Tuesday, 27 January 2009
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- RE: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: Recent Selectors API Updates (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call)
- Re: [WebIDL] Including other IDL fragments
- [WebIDL] Including other IDL fragments
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
Monday, 26 January 2009
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2
- Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] SVG WG Review of Selectors API
- Re: [selectors-api] LCWD comments
- CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API I18N Review...
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- [widgets] Comment on Widgets 1.0: Digital Signatures - the Usage property
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- Widget Window's Modes: what about different "content" tags
- Re: [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
Saturday, 24 January 2009
Friday, 23 January 2009
- [widgets] Renaming "thumbnail" to "screenshot"
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- [widgets] Focus & widgets management, was: RE: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments
- Publishing Element Traversal errata
Thursday, 22 January 2009
- [widgets] Minutes from 22 January 2009 Voice Conference
- [widgets] APIs and Events 1.0 draft comments
- Re: [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- [widgets] Removing plugins attribute
- [widgets] Recent updates to packaging specification
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Re: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- RE: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- Re: tag: uri scheme
- Re: tag: uri scheme
- RE: tag: uri scheme
- Re: tag: uri scheme
- RE: tag: uri scheme
- Re: tag: uri scheme
- RE: tag: uri scheme
Wednesday, 21 January 2009
- Re: Origin IETF draft
- [widgets] Agenda for 22 January 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: Widget Packaging and configuration LC review
- Re: [whatwg] onerror
Tuesday, 20 January 2009
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- Widget Packaging and configuration LC review
- [widgets] A proposal on widget modes
- Re: [Web Workers API] Data synchronization
- Re: [Web Workers API] Data synchronization
- RE: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.
- FW: tag: uri scheme
Monday, 19 January 2009
- Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Origin IETF draft
- Re: Origin IETF draft
Saturday, 17 January 2009
- Re: [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values
- Re: Using W3C widgets in a web container: two implementations contrasted
- Re: Origin IETF draft
- Re: Origin IETF draft
- Origin IETF draft
- onerror
- Re: [Web Workers API] Data synchronization
- [Web Workers API] Data synchronization
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
Friday, 16 January 2009
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- updated Widgets Signature and properties
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: Fwd: SVG 1.1 Java interface license
Thursday, 15 January 2009
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- [widgets] Minutes from 15 January 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 8 January 2009 Voice Conference
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
Thursday, 15 January 2009
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- RE: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values
- [access-control] Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * and ascii-origin in IE8
- http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values
- [widgets] P&C 1.0 Last Call WD: localization comments
- Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?
- [widgets] Agenda for 15 January 2009 Voice Conference
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: [access-control] Header definitions
- Re: [access-control] Allow example bug
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
Tuesday, 13 January 2009
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: [access-control] Rename spec?
- [access-control] Rename spec?
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- RE: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Re: Do we need to rename the Origin header?
- Do we need to rename the Origin header?
Monday, 12 January 2009
- RE: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
- Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface
Sunday, 11 January 2009
Saturday, 10 January 2009
Friday, 9 January 2009
- Re: Progress Events normative text
- Re: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
- Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging & Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009
Thursday, 8 January 2009
- [widgets] Minutes from 8 January 2009 Voice Conference
- Widget Signature Issue - DSA-SHA256 may not be good algorithm choice
- updates Widgets 1.0 Digital Signatures
- Re: Updated Signature Properties Draft
- [widgets] DigSig, usage of 'not required' in Document Profile section
- Proposed changes to Widgets Signatures
- Updated Signature Properties Draft
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- RE: Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: ISSUE-75: Document pointer needs fixing [XHR]
- Re: [XHR] blocking httpOnly cookies
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
- [widgets] Agenda for 8 January 2009 Voice Conference
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
Monday, 5 January 2009
- Comments on Widgets 1.0 Security requirements
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Update to Widgets Signatures Editors Draft
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Proposal #2 clarifying details
- RE: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
Friday, 2 January 2009
- Re: Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite
- Proposal: Detecting when the user leaves a page due to hitting the back button or typing in a URL or going to a favorite