- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 12:28:19 -0400
- To: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Oliver Hunt <oliver@apple.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Thanks for taking the lead on this Arun! Since we eventually need to show we've "satisfied its [=the spec's] relevant technical requirements" [1], did the Web API WG do some related requirements work? If yes, where can we find that work? -Regards, Art Barstow [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call> On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:28 PM, ext Arun Ranganathan wrote: > > All, > > On behalf of Mozilla, I'd like to take over as editor of the > FileUpload spec., which was actually once assigned to me quite some > time ago :) > > Of course, I think that >> form.getDataAsString(); >> > form serialization is out of scope of this particular > specification, but I think other things like Blobs (as per the > Google Gears proposal -- maybe a File interface can have a getBlobs > on it) are probably in, as well as some other interface proposals > by Opera, etc. Security makes or breaks all of this, so I'll start > with the restrictions we've put on this as a strawperson. After > talking to Jonas, I also think "File Download" should be in scope, > again modulo security which, following a straw person, is a welcome > group discussion. > > I've gotten CVS access from Mike. I'd like till the end of the > week (next week) to turn around a a first revision. > > -- A* >
Received on Sunday, 7 September 2008 16:29:20 UTC