- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:21:12 -0400
- To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26. Please see the following for details: <http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item14> -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:30 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-21: should Widgets 1.0 allow fallback for <content> element? > [Widgets] > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/ > > Raised by: Marcos Caceres > On product: Widgets > > Currently, only one <content> element is allowed in a configuration > document. This means that authors can't point to alternative > representations of their widgets. For example, I might want to load > a flash version, and, failing that I might want to load a HTML > version. this could maybe be solved by allowing something similar to: > > <content src="someFile" type="some/mediaType"> > <content src="someOtherFile"type="text/html"/> > </content> > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 30 August 2008 14:22:00 UTC