- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:39:43 -0400
- To: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- CC: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Garrett Smith wrote: > Given that, I suggest moving forward: > Test, then document those methods as having special behavior. Do > this not by a null->value mapping, but by documenting the method's > algorithm in simple terms. e.g. "if X is not a string, throw an error" But giving a (per-method) mapping means that the algorithm can then be machine-generated from the IDL, which is an interoperability win: less chance of a mistake being made. So why are you opposed to having such per-method mappings, as needed? -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 21:40:28 UTC