- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:24:42 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> :not(svg|*) > svg|svg > > I think the point Anne tried to make is that you can somehow work around > it if you accept that your workaround may fail in unusual situations, so > here you'd use `svg:not(:root)` and accept that it breaks with non-SVG > 'svg' elements, and 'svg' elements directly contained in SVG fragments. That latter doesn't seem like an unusual situation, so much... is it? > Using `//svg:svg[ not(parent::svg:*) ]` is another viable alternative... So not using selectors-api at all? Sure. But then why are we bothering with selectors api? -Boris
Received on Saturday, 12 July 2008 18:25:28 UTC