- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:46:28 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Jul 10, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:17:29 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > wrote: >> To make it clear, since i'll be on vacation and won't be very >> responsive on email the coming week, the current syntax is not >> acceptible to mozilla. If referring to the above rfcs is not an >> option for some reason, we need to define the syntax in some other >> way that disallows full uris that includes paths. > > I don't understand why it's not acceptible. You just shipped Firefox > 3 which uses exactly this syntax for more or less the same purpose. > > (I will also be going on vacation soonish for what it's worth. 17 > Jul - 6 Aug.) I hope the header names and values can be resolved before then. - Maciej
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 21:47:08 UTC