Tuesday, 30 September 2008
- [widgets] Google's updates engine
- [AC] Not preflighting HEAD
- Re: Some comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration
- Re: [widgets] Preferences API
- Re: [widgets] Preferences API
- Re: [widgets] Preferences API
- W3C Workshop on Security for Access to Device APIs - London, December 10-11
- Re: [widgets] Preferences API
- Re: [widgets] Preferences API
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
Monday, 29 September 2008
- [widgets] Preferences API
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [AC] Access-Control-Allow-Origin header syntax
Friday, 26 September 2008
- Reminder: SVG 1.2 Tiny Last Call Comments Requested
- Widgets digital signatures, off-list discussion about requirements and algorithms.
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Seeking feedback regarding Widgets Digital Signatures spec
- Re: typo in Widgets 1.0: Requirements (2nd Last Call),Editor's Draft 22 September 2008
- ISSUE-76: Document pointer needs fixing [XHR]
- ISSUE-75: Document pointer needs fixing [XHR]
Thursday, 25 September 2008
- typo in Widgets 1.0: Requirements (2nd Last Call),Editor's Draft 22 September 2008
- Re: [AC] Access-Control-Allow-Origin header syntax
- [AC] Access-Control-Allow-Origin header syntax
- [widgets] Updates
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- [widgets] Minutes from 25 September 2008 Voice Conference
Wednesday, 24 September 2008
- Re: No DOM 3 Telecon Today?
- No DOM 3 Telecon Today?
- [widgets] Agenda for 25 September 2008 Voice Conference
Tuesday, 23 September 2008
- Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
Monday, 22 September 2008
- RE: [D3E] Include mouse capture functionality
- Re: [D3E] Include mouse capture functionality
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- [widgets] Last Call WD #2 of Widgets 1.0 Requirements published; Comments Due 13 October 2008
- [D3E] Include mouse capture functionality
Friday, 19 September 2008
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
Saturday, 20 September 2008
- Word omission
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
Friday, 19 September 2008
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
- [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header
Thursday, 18 September 2008
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Re: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- [widgets] Minutes from 18 September 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Fwd: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
Wednesday, 17 September 2008
- Re: Widget Icon behaviour...
- Re: [widgets] <update> death of the etag attr
- Re: Widget Icon behaviour...
- Re: Widget Icon behaviour...
- [widgets] Agenda for 18 September 2008 Voice Conference
- Widget Icon behaviour...
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
Tuesday, 16 September 2008
- Re: Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Re: Some comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration
- Some comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration
Monday, 15 September 2008
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [widgets] <update> death of the etag attr
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [widgets] Timeless' Widgets Requirements LC
Sunday, 14 September 2008
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- Re: [access-control] Implementation comments
- [access-control] Implementation comments
Saturday, 13 September 2008
Friday, 12 September 2008
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: [widgets] <update> death of the etag attr
- Re: [widgets] <update> death of the etag attr
- [widgets] <update> death of the etag attr
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
Thursday, 11 September 2008
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
- XProc 1.0 nearing the end of (2nd) Last Call, comments invited
- [widgets] Minutes from 11 September 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- old WAF WG wiki to be deleted; save your content
- Re: [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
Wednesday, 10 September 2008
- Re: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Apologies--not able to attend the teleconference today.
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- RE: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- WebIDL in the News
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: [widgets] Agenda for 11 September 2008 Voice Conference
- [widgets] Agenda for 11 September 2008 Voice Conference
- RE: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- [widgets] i18n <span> element VS unicode RLM/LRM
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Indicating acceptable request entity encodings (was Re: Support for compression in XHR?)
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
Tuesday, 9 September 2008
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- [widgets] feature element strawman
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Support for compression in XHR?
- Support for compression in XHR?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
Monday, 8 September 2008
- [xmlhttprequest2] loadend / done / ...
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
- Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
- loadend event Re: [ProgressEvents]
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
- [ProgressEvents] 'loadend' progressevent (Was: Re: [ProgressEvents])
- Re: [ProgressEvents]
Sunday, 7 September 2008
- Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
- [ProgressEvents]
- Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
Saturday, 6 September 2008
Friday, 5 September 2008
- FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements - Editor's Draft 15 August 2008
- Re: [widgets] Timeless' Widgets Requirements LC
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements - Editor's Draft 15 August 2008
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- [xmlhttprequest2] timeout and JSON
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments
- Re: ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through
Thursday, 4 September 2008
- Re: [widgets] CCPP in widgets, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: [Widgets] R21. Resource Declarations. Was RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- [widgets] package updates @notify strawman
- Re: [XHR2] Editorial: OPENED State
- Re: [XHR2] upload complete flag
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest2] comments
- Re: Proposed errata for DOM2 Range regarding insertNode()
- Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- RE: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through
- RE: Web IDL? An IDL for the Web?
Wednesday, 3 September 2008
- RE: [widgets] CCPP in widgets, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- RE: [Widgets] R21. Resource Declarations. Was RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Web IDL? An IDL for the Web?
- Re: Proposed errata for DOM2 Range regarding insertNode()
- Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 03 September 2008 (Now!!)
- Re: Proposed errata for DOM2 Range regarding insertNode()
- Re: Web IDL? An IDL for the Web?
- Web IDL? An IDL for the Web?
- [widgets] Renaming the spec
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
- Re: OMTP BONDI input to W3C - non-W3C RF committed contributions highlighted
- Re: [widgets] Minutes from 7 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [Widgets] - Requirements Working Draft 23 June 2008 Review
Tuesday, 2 September 2008
Sunday, 31 August 2008
Thursday, 28 August 2008
Saturday, 30 August 2008
- Re: ISSUE-45 (Extensible metadata): Do we need an extensible metadata hook? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-36: Is the file API going to be part of Widgets 1.0? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-35: SVG as an icon format. [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-34: What happens when one runs out of storage space when decompressing a widget? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-21: should Widgets 1.0 allow fallback for <content> element? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-20 (Content multi-view): Current <content> model does not allow multiple views [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-18 (api-availability): Need to efine a mechanism to check for the availability of an API [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through
- Re: ISSUE-15: Allow or deny installing additional digital certificates on widget engines? [Widgets]
- [widgets] Minutes of 28 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting
- [widgets] Minutes of 27 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting
- [widgets] Minutes of 26 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting
Thursday, 28 August 2008
- Regarding DOM 3 Tests Format
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [access-control] Publishing
- [access-control] Publishing
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
Wednesday, 27 August 2008
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- OMTP BONDI input to W3C - non-W3C RF committed contributions highlighted
- Sound quality; widget signatures
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
Tuesday, 26 August 2008
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Fwd: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [access-control] Proposal
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
Monday, 25 August 2008
- Widgets 1.0: Requirements comment
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5
- Re: File Upload Status ?
Thursday, 21 August 2008
- [widgets] Minutes from 21 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [widgets] Timeless' Widgets Requirements LC
- Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements - Editor's Draft 15 August 2008
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
- Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1
- Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1
- Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1
- [widgets] Agenda for 21 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
Tuesday, 19 August 2008
- ElementTraversal support in Firefox 3.1
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
Saturday, 16 August 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
Friday, 15 August 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Tracker Guidelines
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
Thursday, 14 August 2008
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- [widgets] Minutes from 14 August 2008 Voice Conference
- [widgets] MWBP WG Comments of Widgets Reqs LC WD, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- [widgets] CCPP in widgets, was Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
Thursday, 14 August 2008
- Re: Fwd: Element Traversal is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)
- Re: Fwd: Element Traversal is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)
Wednesday, 13 August 2008
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: Fwd: Element Traversal is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)
- Re: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- RE: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- RE: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- Re: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- RE: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- Re: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- Fwd: Element Traversal is a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)
- Re: comment on Element Traversal Spec
- comment on Element Traversal Spec
- Please use this Mail List for Technical Discussions! [Was: Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics]
- [widgets] Agenda for 14 August 2008 Voice Conference
- RE: [widgets] Minutes from 7 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: ISSUE-16: Do widgets need their own URI scheme? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-16: Do widgets need their own URI scheme? [Widgets]
- Re: ISSUE-16: Do widgets need their own URI scheme? [Widgets]
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: FW: Widgets i18n feedback
- ISSUE-46 (i18n Span-Like Element): Need to define a <span> for i18n purposes in configuration document [Widgets]
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
Tuesday, 12 August 2008
- [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Fwd: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: Fwd: File Upload Status ?
- Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments
Monday, 11 August 2008
Sunday, 10 August 2008
Saturday, 9 August 2008
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
Friday, 8 August 2008
- Re: Fwd: File Upload Status ?
- Re: Fwd: File Upload Status ?
- Fwd: File Upload Status ?
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- Request to review Content Transformation Guidelines Last Call Working Draft
- RE: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: File Upload Status ?
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- File Upload Status ?
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- [Widgets] R21. Resource Declarations. Was RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- ISSUE-45 (Extensible metadata): Do we need an extensible metadata hook? [Widgets]
Thursday, 7 August 2008
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- RE: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- RE: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
- [widgets] Minutes from 7 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Fwd: Initial input for discussion of Widget security model
- Re: Widget Requirements: Updates vs security
- RE: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- Fwd: [widgets] Widgets URI scheme
- Re: Comments on Widgets 1.0: Requirements LCWD
- Widget Requirements: Updates vs security
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
Wednesday, 6 August 2008
- Re: My Action Item
- My Action Item
- RE: Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 06 August 2008 (Today!!)
- RE: Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 06 August 2008 (Today!!)
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 06 August 2008 (Today!!)
Tuesday, 5 August 2008
- [widgets] Agenda for 7 August 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
Monday, 4 August 2008
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
- Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
Saturday, 2 August 2008
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (1 of 2)
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
Friday, 1 August 2008
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- RE: Accessibility requirement
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
- [widgets] OMTP input to W3C Widget Requirements (2 of 2)
- [wbs] response to 'Do you approve advancing the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation?'
- Proposal to advance Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD
Thursday, 31 July 2008
- FW: Widgets i18n feedback
- [widgets] Minutes from 31 July 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: Accessibility requirement
- Re: [Widgets] - Requirements Working Draft 23 June 2008 Review
Wednesday, 30 July 2008
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- [widgets] Agenda for 31 July 2008 Voice Conference
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Re: [Element Traversal LC] Minor comments
- Re: Element Traversal comment
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
- Element Traversal comment
- [Widgets] - Requirements Working Draft 23 June 2008 Review
- Re: [Element Traversal LC] XML Core (no comment) review
- Re: ISSUE-5 (Unexpanded Entities): Wording for the Treatment of Unexpanded Entity References and Entity Replacement Markup [Element Traversal]
- Reminder: No DOM3 Events Telcon, 30 July 2008
- RE: [whatwg] ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- ISSUE-44 (EventsAndWindow): Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-43 (FireEvents): When should the events defined by DOM3 Events fire? [DOM3 Events]
Monday, 28 July 2008
- Coordinating XML Events and DOM3 Events
- Re: Accessibility requirement
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
Saturday, 26 July 2008
Thursday, 24 July 2008
Wednesday, 23 July 2008
- Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]
- Not able to attend the call today...
- ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]
- ISSUE-41 (New Non-NS Event Methods): Should all event methods have namespaced and non-namespaced equivalents?
- [D3E] Few comments
- Agenda: DOM3 Events Telcon, 23 July 2008 (Today!!)
Tuesday, 22 July 2008
Monday, 21 July 2008
- RE: Accessibility requirement
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [whatwg] Progress Events "done" event
- Re: Can HTTP headers encode enough URLs?
- Re: Can HTTP headers encode enough URLs?
- Can HTTP headers encode enough URLs? (was: XDomainRequest Integration with AC)
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
Sunday, 20 July 2008
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
Saturday, 19 July 2008
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
Friday, 18 July 2008
- Re: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- RE: XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- XDomainRequest Integration with AC
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- New file I/O build
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Widgets and :context
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: #webapps is now logged
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: #webapps is now logged
- Re: #webapps is now logged
- #webapps is now logged
- Re: Widgets and :context
- Re: Opera's Proposal for :context Selector
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
Thursday, 17 July 2008
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files
- Re: Widgets and :context
- Widgets and :context
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [SelectorsAPI] Analysis of Context-Rooted Queries
- [minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 16 July 2008
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
Wednesday, 16 July 2008
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Telcon today
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 16 July 2008 (Today!!)
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api]
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: Accessibility requirement
- ISSUE-39 (Mutate Mutations): Consider Changing Ordering of DOM3 Events [DOM3 Events]
- [D3E] Possible Changes to Mutation Events
- Re: [access-control] Proposal
- Re: [access-control] Proposal
Monday, 14 July 2008
- Re: Accessibility requirement
- [access-control] Proposal
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- [widgets] Widgets i18n feedback
- Re: Accessibility requirement
- [selectors-api] Feature Requests for Version 2
- Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
Sunday, 13 July 2008
Saturday, 12 July 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives
- Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI
- Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI
- Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI
Friday, 11 July 2008
- [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI
- Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents
- Accessibility requirement
- Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- Re: [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- [selectors-api] Why null as opposed to empty string (or either one) to resolve default namespace
- [selectors-api] Why does the default namespace have to be resolved?
- Re: Behavior of querySelector/querySelectorAll with |div and *|div
- Re: [selectors-api] NSResolver moving nodes between documents
- Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
Thursday, 10 July 2008
- Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Catalog Data
- Proposal for :context Selector
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [AC] Preflight-less POST
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: Cross-Site Requests, Users, UI (and What We're Trying to Fix)
Thursday, 10 July 2008
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2
- Re: [access-control] Update
- [AC] Preflight-less POST
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- RE: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- RE: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- RE: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [access-control] Update
- Re: [selectors-api] Clarification about ElementSelector.querySelectorAll's scope
- [minutes] DOM3 Events Telcon, 9 July 2008
- Re: Selectors API and [Null] / [Undefined]
- DOM3 Events Telcon Agenda, 9 July 2008 (Today!!)
- [AC] Deviations due to security policies
- Re: [SelectorsAPI] Selector detection needed?
- Re: [selectors-api] Extended Attribute [NoNull] in the IDL
- Re: [selectors-api] Leading and Trailing Whitespace in Selectors
- Re: Behavior of querySelector/querySelectorAll with |div and *|div
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: [selectors-api] Extended Attribute [NoNull] in the IDL
- Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2
- Re: [selectors-api] What DOM feature "Selectors API" belongs to?
- Re: Behavior of querySelector/querySelectorAll with |div and *|div
- ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total
- Re: [access-control] Update
Tuesday, 8 July 2008
- [access-control] XDomainRequest
- [access-control] Issue list
- [access-control] Update
- Re: Behavior of querySelector/querySelectorAll with |div and *|div
- Behavior of querySelector/querySelectorAll with |div and *|div
Monday, 7 July 2008
- Re: [XMLHttpRequest]HttpOnly cookies visibility in XMLHttpRequest
- Re: Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)
- Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL
- Re: Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)
- Re: Element Nodelist - ISSUE-6 (was: ElementTraversal progress?)
Sunday, 6 July 2008
- Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL
- Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL
- Re: Consensus Call Re: Publishing Web IDL
Saturday, 5 July 2008
Friday, 4 July 2008
- Re: Publishing Web IDL (née Language Bindings for DOM)
- [selectors-api] Test Suite
- Re: Worker Threads and Site Security Policy | Two Possible New Items for Standardization
- Re: Cross-Site Requests, Users, UI (and What We're Trying to Fix)
- Re: ISSUE-34: What happens when one runs out of storage space when decompressing a widget? [Widgets]
- Publishing Web IDL (née Language Bindings for DOM)
- ISSUE-36: Is the file API going to be part of Widgets 1.0? [Widgets]
- ISSUE-35: SVG as an icon format. [Widgets]
- ISSUE-34: What happens when one runs out of storage space when decompressing a widget? [Widgets]
Thursday, 3 July 2008
- Re: Cross-Site Requests, Users, UI (and What We're Trying to Fix)
- Cross-Site Requests, Users, UI (and What We're Trying to Fix)
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
Wednesday, 2 July 2008
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
- Re: [AC] Hardening against DNS rebinding attacks - proposal
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
- Re: [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates
- [widgets] ETags and Automatic updates