- From: W3C Bot <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:38:39 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1283@github.com>
w3cbot created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1283) This issue was created because the 'horizontal review requested' label was added to ยง https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/443 This review is requested prior to the [Advisory Committee Review](https://www.w3.org/guide/process/charter.html#ac-review). New charter proposal, reviewers please take note. # Charter Review [Charter](https://kg-construct.github.io/rml-wg-charter/) [diff from charter template](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/charter-template.html&doc2=[link](https://kg-construct.github.io/rml-wg-charter/)) Expected end of charter refinement phase: [mid-September 2026](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2026Jun/0012.html) What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches. * New - [x] New WG Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. **Also add a "card" for this issue to the [Strategy Funnel](https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/97/views/2).** ## Substantive changes N/A ## Communities suggested for outreach @@ ## Known or potential areas of concern Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...) https://github.com/kg-construct/rml-wg-charter ## Anything else we should think about as we review? I was contacted by the chairs of the [Knowledge Graph Construction CG](https://www.w3.org/community/kg-construct/), who would like to create a Working Group. The WG is producing a set of specification around RML (RDF Mapping Language), which can be seen as a generalization and an extension of [R2RML](https://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/). In particular, while R2RML works only on relational data, RML can map many other kinds of data to RDF. RML specs and tools are largely developed in Academia, but is used in many contexts, including in the industry and governmental agencies. A [Dagstulh seminar](https://www.dagstuhl.de/24061) in February, co-organized by the CG chairs, on a related topic, should be the occasion of identifying more interested stakeholders and gauge their interest ## Charter facilitator(s) cc @pchampin <!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot --> --- Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1283 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1283 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1283@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2026 10:38:43 UTC