Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] SSD wear: does it sound like a real risk? (Issue #511)

ell1e left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#511)

> In terms of buffering, because IndexedDB explicitly has transactional semantics (which section 2.7 calls "durable"), I think specifying any kind of memory buffering would be at odds with the spec.

For what it's worth, I assume the spec could be changed if a big enough security concern is found.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/511#issuecomment-6726505486
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/511/6726505486@github.com>

Received on Sunday, 8 November 2026 20:11:22 UTC