Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: Scroll-Triggered Animations (Issue #1167)

astearns left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1167)

> 1. Regarding the use of `contain` and `cover`: we think this is going to cause developer confusion - whilst re-using syntax is generally a good thing, it seems that the meaning of the keywords here diverges from how they're used in CSS in general. Has the group discussed alternative names - if they were rejected, could you point us to the rationale?

This issue discussion is the earliest bit I’ve found for cover/contain in this context: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6674

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1167#issuecomment-4509372504
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1167/4509372504@github.com>