Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: "flex-wrap:balance" (Issue #1227)

jyasskin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1227)

Thanks for sending us this review. We've decided not to do a detailed review, since this is similar enough to existing features, like `flex-wrap` and `text-wrap:balance` that it doesn't look like it would introduce any new architectural concerns. We're glad to see that the CSSWG is actively working on it, and we appreciate the work you put into writing this explainer and filing this review. We do have 2 comments on your explainer:
1. Explainers should generally live next to their specifications rather than in personal repositories. So inside https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/tree/main/css-flexbox-2 would be ideal.
2. We'd like explainers to [always include the 4 Considerations sections](https://github.com/w3ctag/explainer-explainer/blob/main/template.md#accessibility-internationalization-privacy-and-security-considerations), even if the content is "this feature/use case/design has no privacy implications." That confirms to readers that you did actually consider whether there were implications.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1227#issuecomment-4502740814
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1227/4502740814@github.com>