Re: [whatwg/webidl] Can we change promise resolution behaviour to reduce security issues (Issue #1584) from Anne van Kesteren on 2026-03-27 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2026)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 11:02:00 -0700
To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1584/4144323521@github.com>

annevk left a comment (whatwg/webidl#1584)

It would be interesting to have some example APIs that are impacted by this. Maybe it is everything that takes `Promise<T>` because that implicitly also takes `T`? But we already run JS at the IDL boundary so that seems like a case where maybe you don't need the delay.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1584#issuecomment-4144323521
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1584/4144323521@github.com>

Received on Friday, 27 March 2026 18:02:04 UTC