Re: [whatwg/dom] Define processing instruction attributes (PR #1454)

annevk left a comment (whatwg/dom#1454)

So the concrete worry is that people creating dedicated XML content today would start relying on more leniency in browsers and this would have downstream repercussions? I think that's an acceptable risk. We have evolved XML (with `<template>` and `<script>` for instance) and will continue to do so (with new processing instructions). Tooling will adapt as needed.

If we can't reuse the HTML parser directly or want to create our own, following what https://w3c.github.io/webvtt/#webvtt-cue-text-tokenizer did seems somewhat reasonable, although it would be better with a proper hook in HTML.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1454#issuecomment-4039006781
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1454/c4039006781@github.com>