- From: Brian Kardell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 06:00:27 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1202@github.com>
bkardell created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1202) Recently there was a request to "Reconsider W3C Recommendation status of XSLT 2.0 and XSLT 3.0" (see https://github.com/w3ctag/obsoletion/issues/10). In the process Dan Brickley made what I thought was an interesting comment: I take this as evidence in favour of distinguishing 'Web Platform' > -oriented RECs from 'World Wide Web' RECs. > The former is concerned heavily with implementability, usability, coherent > design, attack surface and technical debt issues. The latter is humanity's > planet-wide shared memory. Once deployed, its data formats do not really > ever go away, and thoughtful specs need to respect this reality. Many W3C > efforts have aspects of both flavour of web standard, but are often closer > to one cluster. XSLT appears for now to be primarily a 'World Wide Web' standard, even if > 0.02% of page loads is still a significant number for the parties trying to > use those pages. XSLT will also continue chugging away in the background, > unseen but enabling many other page views. I don't want to reopen this github issue, but it is worth trying to come up > with a non-polarizing framing for where things like XSLT fit in the web > standards landscape, and how W3C handles its ageing XML portfolio. (see https://github.com/w3ctag/obsoletion/issues/10#issuecomment-3637735401) I think this is an especially interesting point when we also consider that we have a mix of other things deployed in the world too, which aren't just in the browser: Web Views (and embedded views), IWAs, miniapps and so on... It would be interesting to see if there are non-polarizing (maybe more importantly some potentially helpful) ways to define these things... <!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot --> --- Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1202 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1202 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1202@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2026 14:02:03 UTC