- From: edenchuang <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 01:13:02 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 29 June 2026 08:13:06 UTC
edenchuang left a comment (whatwg/fetch#1936) @yoshisatoyanagisawa https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/719 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOjXiGUFf_krkfYaWf5drbqzY7CTxn7EcDYr5ZWjzFg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.4ytttsqbie9c Maybe another case of "Bypassing the Service Worker for XS-Leak prevention on same-origin/cross-origin requests" But I agree that this would confuse web developers. Option 1 would be more aggressive because it also skips the SW for the same-origin request. We probably need a place, maybe the ServiceWorker Spec, to inform ServiceWorker developers which requests will not be intercepted. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1936#issuecomment-4830323810 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1936/4830323810@github.com>
Received on Monday, 29 June 2026 08:13:06 UTC