- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:25:21 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2026 14:25:25 UTC
jakearchibald left a comment (whatwg/fetch#1936) > The developer might still know this is a range request, because they can check the response status of fetch(event.request). It would get 216/406, which implies this is a range request. It's an opaque response so the status is hidden. > In option 2, since the response from the network should be a NetworkError response It'll be an opaque response, no? I think you've misunderstood my proposal, or I'm misunderstanding your comment. [My comment](https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1936#issuecomment-4797544826) wasn't complete in a self-contained way, which is my bad. I've updated it. Does it make more sense now? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1936#issuecomment-4800370371 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1936/4800370371@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2026 14:25:25 UTC