Re: [whatwg/dom] Define processing instruction attributes (PR #1454) from Andrea Giammarchi on 2026-06-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2026)

From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 04:46:48 -0700
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1454/c4798860198@github.com>

WebReflection left a comment (whatwg/dom#1454)

@noamr apologies for this last question: I've checked tests to shape the poly and what I haven't found in there is any test for `pi.attributes` as read-only accessor ... has this been discussed at all, would this ever land or ... *YAGNI* ? Thanks, that proxy/map/iterable thing would add bloat but I was curious to understand if it's needed (or will be needed) at all ... I am all for the *YAGNI* approach though, for what is worth it.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1454#issuecomment-4798860198
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1454/c4798860198@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2026 11:46:53 UTC