pchampin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1161)
Dear TAG,
[this PR](https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/107) on N-Triples implements the conclusions of our discussions (as we understood them):
* we do specify how to process errors
* we acknowledge that, although unspecified in N-Triples 1.0, existing parsers already work that way (i.e. signal errors and emit less triples, possibly none),
including when they encounter the VERSION directive?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161#issuecomment-4682787080
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161/4682787080@github.com>