Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: RDF 1.2 N-Triples (Issue #1161)

pchampin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1161)

Dear TAG,
[this PR](https://github.com/w3c/rdf-n-triples/pull/107) on N-Triples implements the conclusions of our discussions (as we understood them):

* we do specify how to process errors
* we acknowledge that, although unspecified in N-Triples 1.0, existing parsers already work that way (i.e. signal errors and emit less triples, possibly none),
  including when they encounter the VERSION directive?


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161#issuecomment-4682787080
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161/4682787080@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2026 16:36:56 UTC