Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG Revision: MathML 4 (Issue #1205)

jyasskin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1205)

Thanks for sending us this review. We were concerned that you might be re-inventing semantic MathML, but after discussion, we're satisfied that this syntax is more helpful to practical assistive technology tools. We appreciate that you're coordinating with the ARIA WG to ensure that this fits into the rest of the platform. We noticed that you have separate documents for [core](https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/intent-core-concepts/) and [open](https://w3c.github.io/mathml-docs/intent-open-concepts/) lists of concepts. We suspect that these should be [W3C Registries](https://www.w3.org/policies/process/#registries) instead of plain documents.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1205#issuecomment-4608084653
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1205/4608084653@github.com>