Re: [whatwg/webidl] Support syntax for specifying that an optional record<K, V> has a default value of an empty record<K, V> (Issue #1566) from Dominic Farolino on 2026-01-31 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2026)

From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:22:42 -0800
To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1566/3829576215@github.com>

domfarolino left a comment (whatwg/webidl#1566)

@caseq is our main bindings lead at this point, what do you think Andrey? This seems like a good idea; it's probably not too difficult.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1566#issuecomment-3829576215
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1566/3829576215@github.com>

Received on Saturday, 31 January 2026 23:22:46 UTC