Re: [whatwg/webidl] Support syntax for specifying that an optional record<K, V> has a default value of an empty record<K, V> (Issue #1566) from Anne van Kesteren on 2026-01-31 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2026)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 04:59:00 -0800
To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1566/3828455643@github.com>

annevk left a comment (whatwg/webidl#1566)

@saschanaz @noamr thoughts for Gecko and Chromium? I think we should do this because removing the distinction between missing and empty seems worthwhile. One less thing for specification algorithms to normalize.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1566#issuecomment-3828455643
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1566/3828455643@github.com>

Received on Saturday, 31 January 2026 12:59:04 UTC