Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clarify behaviour of `AbortSignal` in `FetchEvent::respondWith` (Issue #1662)

yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1662)

These seem to be two sides of the same coin.
#1544 covers the client -> ServiceWorker direction, where a client-side abort should be reflected in the FetchEvent's request signal.
#1662 covers the ServiceWorker -> client direction, where an abort in the ServiceWorker should be correctly recognized by the client.
Since they address the same boundary from opposite sides, what do you think?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1662#issuecomment-3758815618
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1662/3758815618@github.com>