Re: [whatwg/dom] concept-node-equals definition is not correct (Issue #1443)

abacabadabacaba left a comment (whatwg/dom#1443)

Then perhaps it would be better to replace both conditions (the one that states that the attribute lists' sizes are equal, and the one quoted in the bug description) with just one: "There is a one-to-one correspondence between A's attributes and B's attributes such that corresponding attributes are equal."

Current definition is also awkward because part of it is in the list that switches on the A's interface and part of it is underneath, even though it is also specific to a particular interface.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1443#issuecomment-3705983920
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1443/3705983920@github.com>