Re: [whatwg/webidl] Define that interface objects are constructors (#698)

NoMercyTH left a comment (whatwg/webidl#698)

> ES claims the following (twice):
> 
> > Built-in function objects that are not identified as constructors do not implement the [[Construct]] internal method unless otherwise specified in the description of a particular function.
> 
> We don't normatively identify the interface object as a constructor, even if it has a `[Constructor]`. I guess we should.
> 
> A less obvious question is what we should do if there's no `[Constructor]`. Right now, I think we're aiming to install a [[Construct]] internal method that always throws, but that makes the interface object pass [IsConstructor()](https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-isconstructor).



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/698#issuecomment-3966833970
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/698/3966833970@github.com>