Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] should `ServiceWorker` interface implement `AbstractWorker` mixin? (#1268)

monica-ch left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1268)

Bug triage: Keeping `AbstractWorker` in the spec to not to break any sites although spec doesn't use onerror event (AbstractWorker). All related algorithms rejects with promise.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1268#issuecomment-3930971963
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1268/3930971963@github.com>

Received on Friday, 20 February 2026 00:53:32 UTC