Re: [whatwg/url] Ambiguity with the 1st clause of the "no scheme state" in basic parser. (Issue #867) from Anne van Kesteren on 2026-02-12 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2026)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 08:56:58 -0800
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/867/3892122975@github.com>

annevk left a comment (whatwg/url#867)

Yeah, the comma is supposed to make this clear.

Anyway, I support rewriting this to use early returns. That would also shorten what is now step 2 (then step 3).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/867#issuecomment-3892122975
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/867/3892122975@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 12 February 2026 16:57:02 UTC