Re: [whatwg/dom] Pass better parent/root information to (re)moving steps. (PR #1450)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> @@ -3108,9 +3108,10 @@ to do these things asynchronously, however.
 
   <ol>
    <li>
-    <p>If <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> is <var>node</var>, then run the <a>moving steps</a> with
-    <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> and <var>oldParent</var>. Otherwise, run the <a>moving steps</a>
-    with <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> and null.
+    <p>Let <var>isSubtreeRoot</var> be whether <var>inclusiveDescendant</var> is <var>node</var>.

I think we should only add it to the moving steps for now then? Not entirely sure though, perhaps it's nicer if the relevant moving and removing steps can be similar. Bit unfortunate we already need that much context, but so be it.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1450#discussion_r2784097396
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1450/review/3774837904@github.com>