Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: CSS Image Animation (Issue #1237)

frivoal left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1237)

> However, the explainer also specifies different UA behaviour based on whether an image is a content, or a decorative, image - so is there a contradiction there that needs to be resolved?

That distinction is only used in hypothetical future extensions. It has been dropped from the spec, as it was causing more confusion than anything. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0eb48905bfc4b60d60a825602530413966af1eb2 for the corresponding spec fix, and https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/10488e373bcd89d8b9c9bf794540b139f555b0d5 for the explainer


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1237#issuecomment-5392590814
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1237/5392590814@github.com>