[w3ctag/design-reviews] [wg/wasm] WebAssembly WG rechartering (Issue #1220)

w3cbot created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1220)

This issue was created because the 'horizontal review requested' label was added to
§ https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/533

This review is requested prior to the [Advisory Committee Review](https://www.w3.org/guide/process/charter.html#ac-review).

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

# Charter Review

[Charter](https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/2026/wasm-wg-charter.html)

[diff from charter template](https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://w3c.github.io/charter-drafts/charter-template.html&doc2=https://www.w3.org/2023/wasm-wg-charter.html)

Expected end of charter refinement phase: [2026-03-29](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2026JanMar/0020.html)

[chair dashboard](https://www.w3.org/PM/Groups/chairboard.html?gid=wg/wasm)

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches. 

 - [X] Existing WG recharter 
 
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. **Also add a "card" for this issue to the [Strategy Funnel](https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/97/views/2).**

## Known or potential areas of concern

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised?

This strategy funnel issue.

## Anything else we should think about as we review?

Nothing

@dschuff @lukewagner

## Charter facilitator(s)

cc @sideshowbarker

<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->
---

Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1220


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1220
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1220@github.com>