[w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: Direction feature for `scroll-state()` query (Issue #1153)

tursunova created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1153)

### Specification

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-5/#direction

### Explainer

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.md#direction

### Links

- The WG's request for this TAG review: n/a
- Previous early design review, if any: n/a
- An introduction to the feature, aimed at unfamiliar audiences: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.md#direction
- A description of the problems that end-users were facing before this proposal: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6400
- Alternatives considered: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.md#workaround
- Examples of how to use the proposal to solve the end-users' problems: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/blob/main/css-conditional-5/scroll_state_explainer.md#direction
- What do the end-users experience with this proposal: n/a
- User research you did to validate the problem and/or design, if any: n/a
- Web Platform Tests: to be added to https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-conditional/container-queries/scroll-state


### The specification

- [x] Follows the [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/).
- [x] Includes Security and Privacy Considerations sections based on answers to the [Security/Privacy Questionnaire](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/).

### Where and by whom is the work is being done?

- GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/tree/main
- Primary contacts:
  - Munira Tursunova (@tursunova), Google, spec change collaborator
- Organization/project driving the specification: Google
- This work is being funded by: Google
- Primary standards group developing this feature: CSS Working Group
- Incubation and standards groups that have discussed the design:
  - Spec change PR: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12664


### Feedback so far

- Active horizontal reviews: n/a
- Multi-stakeholder feedback:
  - Chromium comments: n/a
  - Mozilla comments: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1296
  - WebKit comments: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/548
  - See discussion in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6400
- Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12623
- Status/issue trackers for implementations: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5083137520173056  <!-- Include links to [Chrome Status](https://chromestatus.com/), [Mozilla's](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/), [WebKit's Bugzilla](https://bugs.webkit.org/), and trackers for other implementations if those are known to you. -->


### You should also know that...

_No response_

<!-- Content below this is maintained by @w3c-tag-bot -->
---

Track conversations at https://tag-github-bot.w3.org/gh/w3ctag/design-reviews/1153


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1153
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1153@github.com>