- From: Tim van der Lippe <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:59:42 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2025 17:59:46 UTC
@TimvdLippe commented on this pull request. > @@ -8919,6 +8919,10 @@ set; otherwise false. <p>The <dfn attribute for=Request><code>signal</code></dfn> getter steps are to return <a>this</a>'s <a for="Request">signal</a>. +<p class="note"><a>this</a>'s <a for="Request">signal</a> is always initialized in the +<a href="#ref-for-request-signal②">constructor</a> and when +<a href="#ref-for-request-signal⑤">cloning</a>. Hm, I wanted to be fancy and point to the exact assignment that assures this. However, the numbers already don't match, as this note also refers to signal. Is there a less brittle way to do this or should we link to the algorithm as a whole and that's sufficient? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1856#pullrequestreview-3231112689 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1856/review/3231112689@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2025 17:59:46 UTC