Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Approximate Geolocation (Issue #1131)

alvinjiooo left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1131)

> I also wanted to individually add that
> 
> 4. Your specification link should to go to [the PR defining this feature](https://github.com/w3c/geolocation/pull/195), and not to the overall spec that it will eventually land in.

Thanks! I have this link now update in the TAG review issue content.

> 6. I believe you're using the wrong one of "precision" vs "accuracy": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision. You've copied the mistake from the old field, but since you're replacing that field, maybe you can fix the mistake.

I wonder do you think we should change from using "precise" to "accurate" in the proposed `AccuracyMode`?


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1131#issuecomment-3286404313
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1131/3286404313@github.com>