Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Mark transactions inactive during key serialization (PR #479)

asutherland left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#479)

> After re-reading your comment, I realized you weren't talking specifically about Firefox's implementation.

Yes.

> I agree we can make this work with `IDBCursor#continue` / `continuePrimaryKey` as well. Updated the spec language and updated the tests at [web-platform-tests/wpt#55660](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/55660) .

Thank you; I like the introduction of the wrapper, this seems very clean!

@evanstade and @SteveBeckerMSFT in https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/476 I think we were initially only talking about matching Firefox; are you okay with the (consistent) expansion to also cover the cursor continue methods?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/479#issuecomment-3453095639
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/479/c3453095639@github.com>

Received on Monday, 27 October 2025 20:06:37 UTC