- From: Alice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 03:06:36 -0700
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2025 10:06:44 UTC
alice left a comment (WICG/webcomponents#1114) > I think developer tools should expose "validity" (I think this term is rather confusing, but I can't immediately think of something better). I think developer tools should definitely have a way of exposing the computed attr-associated element which is used internally, at the very least. Might that be enough for expressing "validity" in this instance, or do you also think we need a coarser, squiggly-line/other error indicator type of UI? > The caveat to all this is that generally HTML getters do return the computed value where possible. I think you could make an argument that this is as much (or as little) the computed value as something like `el.htmlFor` is. I think most getters which return elements and pre-date element reflection are read-only? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1114#issuecomment-3393131938 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/1114/3393131938@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2025 10:06:44 UTC