Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Incubation: Inline Integrity (Issue #1135)

toreini left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1135)

Dear @mikewest:

The proposal looks interesting. The explainer is aligned with the [TAG's recommendations](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainer-explainer/#introduction); however, we request to consider updating it with these suggestions:

* The `alternate solutions` considered for this incubation is not mentioned in the explainer. Can you please add a section on this structured as Alternative → Pros → Cons → Reason for rejection. That makes the reasoning more transparent to external reviewers.
* The explainer mainly focuses on the developer's benefits and how this integrity mechanism will fulfil their needs. This is ok; however, the explainer should also elaborate on `end-use problem` and explicitly mention how the proposal benefits the end-users. This also should be addressed.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1135#issuecomment-3376016202
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1135/3376016202@github.com>