- From: Yoshisato Yanagisawa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 23:22:55 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2025 07:22:59 UTC
yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1808) I am not fully confident but, Is https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1809 the named parameters you mean? For > Furthermore, the current algorithm checks has showNotification() been successfully invoked regardless of whether the event's waitUntil promises resolve or reject. I assumed that you might want the ServiceWorker specification support to let the caller know promise resolve/reject from the following sentence: > On top of that specifications might want to do something only after the events extension period is over, and perhaps do different things depending on whether the promise resolves or rejects. I supposed that you want "Wait for all of the promises in the [extend lifetime promises](https://www.w3.org/TR/service-workers/#extendableevent-extend-lifetime-promises) of dispatchedEvent to resolve." to be done by the ServiceWorker specification. Can I ask how the ideal caller will be? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1808#issuecomment-3579789496 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1808/3579789496@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2025 07:22:59 UTC