Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider mechanisms to bypass the service worker for things that we know won't be in it's cache (#1026)

yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1026)

Thanks @asutherland to introduce the issue in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1454.
I think SW static routing API's cache source resolves the situation.  With cache or cacheName, the result of cache lookup will be returned if available.  Otherwise, network fallback automatically.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026#issuecomment-3507645077
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026/3507645077@github.com>