Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Support CacheStorage.match() options in SW Static Routing API cache source (Issue #1797)

asutherland left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1797)

The use case and proposed solution sound like a reasonable expansion of the current spec.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1797#issuecomment-3499937349
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1797/3499937349@github.com>

Received on Friday, 7 November 2025 00:21:03 UTC