Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Rethink the TAG's review intake process. (PR #1102)

@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request.



> +          - {{ABC CG}} <!-- Include a link to minutes or issues in this group if possible. -->
+          - {{DEF WG}}
+
+  - type: textarea
+    attributes:
+      label: Feedback so far
+      description: |
+        For your own organization, you can simply state the organization's position instead of linking to it.  This includes items on [Mozilla standards-positions](https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions), and [WebKit standards-positions](https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions).  Chromium doesn't have a standards-positions repository and [prefers](https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:docs/standards/positions/GoogleChrome/README.md) to use comments from the teams that maintain the relevant area of their codebase.
+      value: |
+        - Multi-stakeholder feedback:
+          - Chromium comments:
+          - Mozilla comments: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/NNN <!-- And/or other places they've given feedback -->
+          - WebKit comments: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/NNN <!-- And/or other places they've given feedback -->
+          - {{...include feedback/review from developers, implementers, civil society, and others}}
+        - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification:
+        - Status/issue trackers for implementations⁴: <!-- Include links to [Chrome Status](https://chromestatus.com/), [Mozilla's](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/), [WebKit's Bugzilla](https://bugs.webkit.org/), and trackers for other implementations if those are known to you. -->

Is that "⁴" intentional? 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1102#pullrequestreview-2875933457
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1102/review/2875933457@github.com>