Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Rethink the TAG's review intake process. (PR #1102)

@msporny commented on this pull request.



> +      label: The specification and other documents
+      options:
+        - label: Include an introduction that's understandable by people who weren't familiar with the problem space.
+          required: true
+        - label: Describe [the problems that end-users were facing](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainer-explainer/#end-user-need) before this proposal.
+          required: true
+        - label: Describe the [alternatives that you considered](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainer-explainer/#alternatives).
+          required: true
+        - label: Give [examples of how to use the proposal to solve the end-users' problems, and what the end-users wind up experiencing](https://w3ctag.github.io/explainer-explainer/#describe-proposal).
+        - label: Describe user research you did to validate the problem and/or design.
+        - label: Follow the [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/).
+        - label: Include Security and Privacy Considerations sections based on answers to the [Security/Privacy Questionnaire](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/).

I don't know if it's possible to enable links to be inputted for these checkboxes, but seems like at this point, you should be able to point to specific sections in the spec that cover these points.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1102#pullrequestreview-2874808939
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1102/review/2874808939@github.com>