Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Accessibility conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format 1.1 (Issue #977)

jyasskin left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#977)

We talked about this in our breakout this week: We are supportive of this work, and we are happy for the 1.1 version to go to CR.

We're pleased that you're keen to explore the specificity issues that we raised in a future revision (ideally the next after 1.1). As the spec you're writing is about the _format_ of the rules, then rule documents themselves don't constitute tests of the spec: a linter that can check any given rule documents _against the format_ would constitute a test for the _format's spec_.

We agree that it's important to ensure there are no internationalization concerns. There are ways this could be achieved whilst still fulfilling the need to make the format's spec more precise, and we'd be happy to advise on that later.

We're closing this review with the `satisfied with concerns` label in order to confirm that we support the work you're doing, and we hope to work with you in future to address the specificity issues we raised.

Thank you again for your review request, and for the important work your group is doing.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/977#issuecomment-2902064982
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/977/2902064982@github.com>