Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] The return value for update() is wrong in WebIDL (#1472)

preitinger left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1472)

OK, this goes to far for me...
From my prospective as a user, I would never use any return value from this
function `update()` as it is obvious that even those who write the spec do
not know exactly what and why sth is to return. I know the typescript
signature definition for this function is not really relevant officially,
but for me as user, it will be relevant and I just will never use the
return value of this `update()` function and you can specify what ever is
correct. ;-)
Thank you

Am Mi., 21. Mai 2025 um 08:29 Uhr schrieb Anne van Kesteren <
***@***.***>:

> *annevk* left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1472)
> <https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1472#issuecomment-2896753142>
>
> It's not a matter of opinion.
>
> You have to actually go through all the Job indirection (which could do
> with some refactoring) to see what the promise gets resolved with.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1472#issuecomment-2896753142>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACFPHHCDS7W4YFEDOOJY5BL27QMLHAVCNFSM6AAAAAB4AH4FK2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDQOJWG42TGMJUGI>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1472#issuecomment-2897262526
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1472/2897262526@github.com>