- From: Nigel Megitt <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 02:21:46 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2025 09:21:50 UTC
@nigelmegitt requested changes on this pull request. I would prefer not to do this at all. Instead, I think we should minimise dependencies between the horizontal reviews, and leave the accessibility review with the group that already owns it. I've noticed this before with privacy/security reviews, where there seems to be TAG review duplication. Perhaps what TAG really wants is to make sure that the other HR reviews have been initiated before TAG begins on their review? That way TAG can go and look up the inputs to those other reviews. My perspective here is that of a Chair of a WG that needs to request reviews from time to time, and wanting that process to be as efficient as possible - in my view this change reduces efficiency. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1088#pullrequestreview-2842933092 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/pull/1088/review/2842933092@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2025 09:21:50 UTC