- From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 01:41:06 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/736/2862240227@github.com>
WebReflection left a comment (whatwg/dom#736) I, personally, don't need/care about connected/disconnected events and I feel like it's entirely out of scope, even if proposed as `<fragment>`, 'cause it shouldn't be different from any other element that doesn't natively have those hooks backed in. All these discussions will only delay more and more this proposal which is kinda sad ... we all said "*whatever it is would be better than nothing*" but then we all have opinions that apparently can only cause friction for this proposal to move forward. I think @rniwa nailed it with the fact there is already an easy to implement solution so that we shouldn't keep asking stuff that is not strictly part of the proposal or a requirement when it comes to have anyway a node that can be diffed/moved/removed purposes? The result is likely that nothing will ever land due bikeshedding/features-creep scenarios not meant or needed to start with, imho, so let's please try to stop asking for new things and focus on what's actually best for the current proposal to move forward? It's a primitive, it should do one thing, we can iterate on more things *after* such primitive landed, right? Thanks in advance for your understanding 🙏 -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/736#issuecomment-2862240227 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/736/2862240227@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2025 08:41:11 UTC